For universities, colleges, and school systems: committee decisions preserved, accreditation evidence ready, and policy consistent across faculties.
Minutes and decisions live in attachments across years of email.
Evidence assembled by hand every cycle.
Copies adapt locally until the institution disagrees with itself.
Curriculum and policy changes wait in inboxes.
· Product recreation based on live NILARA workflows.
Every step has an owner, a record, and a seal — so the evidence package assembles itself.
| Step | Owner | What’s recorded | Sealed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal raised | Department | Proposal linked to prior policy | Draft versioned |
| Review | Faculty / committee | Comments captured on the record | Review recorded |
| Committee decision | Governance body | Decision on a defined route | Bound to identity & time |
| Controlled release | Registrar / admin | Effective version published | Prior retained |
| Access | Administrators | Access by role | Access enforced & logged |
| Audit export | Compliance | Ordered decision history | Package exported |
Versioned institutional policies, curriculum records, and accreditation evidence — classified, access-controlled, and export-ready.
Senate and committee approvals, curriculum changes, and policy adoption on defined paths, with every vote and sign-off preserved.
Agendas, actions, and accreditation projects with owners and deadlines — across faculties and terms.
Change drafted with rationale.
Department and faculty review recorded.
Signed at the governing level.
Catalog updated; history preserved.
Authored against current policy.
Stakeholder input on the record.
Adopted with the vote preserved.
Distributed; acknowledgment tracked.
Each criterion assigned an owner.
Records linked, not copied.
Package signed by the lead.
One ordered package for the accreditor.
Every step above is owned, timed, and sealed to the record — these are the workflows we model with you in week one.
Accreditation packages export from the living record.
Committee history preserved across turnover.
Consistent versions across faculties.
Approvals move on paths, not through inboxes.
Answerable records for boards and regulators.
Initiatives, risks, and decisions in one view.
Run these in your evaluation — they’re the moments where governed and “governed” differ.
Proposal to catalog — every review and vote preserved.
Link records to criteria; export one ordered package.
Consultation, sign-off, publication, attestation — on one path.
One effective policy version, visible everywhere.
Rotate committee membership; confirm history stays intact.
Committees, senates, and boards map to routes with recorded votes — governance gets faster without losing deliberation.
Packaging is scoped to your size and needs; education deployments are priced accordingly — ask in the evaluation.
Yes — SAML/OIDC against your identity provider, with SCIM for lifecycle.
We’ll model its agenda-to-decision path — and show the institutional record it builds.